Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)

Amir Khan Nath vs State Of Punjab And Others on 29 January, 2014

Mr. Rajiv Joshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 submits that petitioner's father Malkiat Singh represented before the Assistant Collector yet did not object to the preparation of the naksha and suggested mode of partition and therefore, it does not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to agitate this aspect. LRs have to tow the whim and desire of their father. No separate or independent stand can be taken. Even sanad taksim had also been passed and therefore, appeal before the Collector was not maintainable as the remedy is only under Section 16 (1) of Land Revenue Act in view of the law laid down by this Court in Amar Khan Vs. State of Punjab and others 2009(1) RCR (Civil) 741.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - R Mittal - Full Document
1