Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)Section 16 in The Punjab Land Revenue Rules [Entire Act]
Amir Khan Nath vs State Of Punjab And Others on 29 January, 2014
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4
submits that petitioner's father Malkiat Singh represented before the
Assistant Collector yet did not object to the preparation of the naksha and
suggested mode of partition and therefore, it does not lie in the mouth of the
petitioner to agitate this aspect. LRs have to tow the whim and desire of
their father. No separate or independent stand can be taken. Even sanad
taksim had also been passed and therefore, appeal before the Collector was
not maintainable as the remedy is only under Section 16 (1) of Land
Revenue Act in view of the law laid down by this Court in Amar Khan Vs.
State of Punjab and others 2009(1) RCR (Civil) 741.
1