Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.79 seconds)
Subhash Chand Gupta vs B.S.N.L. Through on 4 April, 2014 cites

Hardwari Lal vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 27 October, 1999

8. We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant Mrs. Rani Chhabra and the learned counsel for the Respondents Shri M.M. Sudan. First of all we observe that there not a single prosecution witness was listed to prove the charge against the applicant. However, Inquiry Officer permitted the Vigilance Officer of the Respondents who held the investigation of the case to be examined and cross-examined. There were no other independent witnesses. As held by the Apex Court in its judgment in the case of Hardwari Lal Vs. State of U.P. & Others 1999 (8) SCC 582 in a departmental enquiry proceedings examination of the material witnesses is a must.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 166 - Full Document

Punjab National Bank And Ors.The Chief ... vs Sh. Kunj Behari Misra, Sh. Shanti Prasad ... on 19 August, 1998

10. The Apex Court in the case of Punjab National Bank Vs. Kunj Behari Misra (1998) 7 SCC 84 has held that whenever the disciplinary authority disagrees with the inquiry authority on any article of charge, before it records its own findings on such charge, it must record its tentative reasons for such disagreement and give the delinquent officer an opportunity to represent before it finally records its findings. The relevant part of the said judgment reads as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 929 - Full Document
1