Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.37 seconds)
Periyar And Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd vs State Of Kerala on 6 September, 1990 cites

Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 21 July, 1988

In Chimanlal Hargovinddas v. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Poona & Anr., [1988] 3 SCC 751 this Court held that the land situated on the frontage have special advantage and the land situated in the interior undeveloped area will not have the value at par since the latter will have lower value than land situated near developed area. Some guesswork is permissible in determining the value and on this basis this Court did not interfere with fixation of market value by the High Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 832 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai (Deceased) ... vs State Of Gujarat on 8 August, 1989

In Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1989 SC 2051 this Court reiterated the ratio in West Bengal Administrator General's case that the persons to prove the fair transaction are either the vendor and the vendee or the person conversant with the sale and they are to be examined. The original sale deed or the certified copy of the sale deed are to be produced.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 51 - M H Kania - Full Document

Kantaben Manibhai Amin And Another vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 27 September, 1989

In Mantaben Manibhai v. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Baroda, AIR 1990 SC 103 to which one of us (L.M. Sharma, J) was a member, this Court held that when the quality of the lands are different (bagayat land and jiryat land). Bagayat land is superior in quality and to what percentage of superiority was not established by the claim- ants. This Court held that addition of 25 per cent of the value of the Jiryat land was held to be proper valuation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 18 - T K Thommen - Full Document
1   2 3 Next