Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.19 seconds)Section 30 in The Punjab Municipal Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Lekh Raj vs The Cantonment Board, Jullundur ... on 12 November, 1957
In support of the contention that a writ is the proper remedy, Mr. Doabia has placed reliance on Lekh Raj v. Cantonment Board, Jullundur, 1938-60 Pun LR 66: (AIR 1958 Punj 358), a decision by Grover J., and on Shiam Sunder v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 Punj 128, a decision by Bishan Narain J., affirmed on appeal by Bhandari C. J. and Chopra J., in Bindra Ban v. Sham Sunder; AIR 1959 Punj 83. I may also notice another contention raised by Mr. Doabia in his attack on the notification dated 30-10-1958.
Bindra Ban And Ors. vs Sham Sunder And Ors. on 17 April, 1958
In support of the contention that a writ is the proper remedy, Mr. Doabia has placed reliance on Lekh Raj v. Cantonment Board, Jullundur, 1938-60 Pun LR 66: (AIR 1958 Punj 358), a decision by Grover J., and on Shiam Sunder v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 Punj 128, a decision by Bishan Narain J., affirmed on appeal by Bhandari C. J. and Chopra J., in Bindra Ban v. Sham Sunder; AIR 1959 Punj 83. I may also notice another contention raised by Mr. Doabia in his attack on the notification dated 30-10-1958.
The Punjab Municipal Act, 1999
Chief Commissioner, Ajmer vs Radhey Shyam Dani on 15 November, 1956
In Radhey Shyam Dani's case. (S) AIR 1957 SC 304, the observations of Bhagwati J. on which reliance has been placed by Mr. Doabia are, in my opinion, not confined to the particular provisions of law contained in the Ajmer Merwara Municipalities Regulation and Ajmer State Municipalities Election Rules as is suggested by the learned Advocate-General.
Section 21 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Parmeshwar Mahaseth And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 10 May, 1957
The publication of this notification really gives the District Magistrate jurisdiction to hold elections of the Commissioner of the Municipality. The provision of Rule 7 was thus held mandatory, non-compliance with which invalidated the entire election. It was further held in that case that the relevant provisions of the Election Rules and the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act do not dispense with the preparation of a separate register of voters, ward by ward, of course, on the basis of the electoral roll of the Assembly constituency.
Shiam Sunder And Anr. vs The State Of Punjab And Ors. on 28 August, 1957
In support of the contention that a writ is the proper remedy, Mr. Doabia has placed reliance on Lekh Raj v. Cantonment Board, Jullundur, 1938-60 Pun LR 66: (AIR 1958 Punj 358), a decision by Grover J., and on Shiam Sunder v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 Punj 128, a decision by Bishan Narain J., affirmed on appeal by Bhandari C. J. and Chopra J., in Bindra Ban v. Sham Sunder; AIR 1959 Punj 83. I may also notice another contention raised by Mr. Doabia in his attack on the notification dated 30-10-1958.