Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)
Bambhania Govindbhai Hamirbhai vs State Of Gujarat on 15 January, 2020 cites

Harijan Paniben Dudabhai vs State Of Gujarat & Ors on 1 July, 2016

(E) In the case of Harijan Paniben (supra) also, considering the question of appointment of servants prior to the 1961 Act which came into force on 1/4/1963, there was no question of a distinction being drawn on the appointment being on a sanctioned post or not, and therefore the Division Bench Judgement in the case of Dahyabhai (Supra) would, in our opinion, made a distinction and dismissed the Petition of the employee on the ground that the appointment was not on a sanctioned post, would not be in consonance with the law laid down in the case of Harijan Paniben (supra) and the judgement of the Constitution Bench in R.K.Soni (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 31 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Una Nagar Palika vs Kaliben Balubhai Makwana . on 20 September, 2018

In Kaliben Balubhai Makwana (supra), the group of Civil Appeal Nos.5529 of 2016 and others dealt with by the Supreme Court, arose from judgment and order dated 06th October, 2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.1122 of 2015, the appellant Municipality had declined to grant pensionary benefits to the employees who are the employees of erstwhile Panchayat converted into Nagar Palika.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 24 - A M Sapre - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Chandubhai Chhotabhai Patel on 3 May, 2018

(Para 25) 5.3 In Chandubhai Chhotabhai Patel (supra), the Division Bench was dealing with the set of appeals preferred by the State and the Panchayat authorities. The stand of the appellants were that since the employees concerned were part of the non-converted Panchayat and their appointments were in accordance with the provisions of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961, they could not be extended pensionary dues.
Gujarat High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 24 - A S Dave - Full Document

Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai (Deceased) ... vs State Of Gujarat on 8 August, 1989

In view of reliance placed on the judgment referred to above we have gone through the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the appellant. Having gone through the aforesaid judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the appellant we are not prepared to accept the submission that the issue in the present appeal is governed by the ratio laid down in the above said judgment. We are of the view that having regard to Page 2 of 10 Downloaded on : Sun Feb 16 23:18:00 IST 2020 C/SCA/10562/2019 JUDGMENT the fact situation both the judgments referred to above would not support the case of the appellant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 51 - M H Kania - Full Document

Narsi Bacha Thacker vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 6 March, 1998

9. The judgment of the learned Single Judge in the case of Narsi Bacha Thacker Vs. State of Gujarat and others, reported in 1998 (1) GLH 1022 also supports the case of the respondent- Gram Panchayat. In the aforesaid judgment it is categorically held that merely because a person is appointed by the Gram Panchayat, he is not entitled for pensionary benefits unless he becomes a member of the Panchayat Service as envisaged under section 203 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961. It is categorically held that unless it is established that the appointed person is a member of the Panchayat Service, he cannot be held to be a civil servant of the State to claim pensionary benefits.
Gujarat High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 19 - R M Doshit - Full Document
1