Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs Union Of India Thr Its Secretary & Anr on 16 February, 2015
In view of the Apex Court decision in Ajay Kumar
Choudhary (supra), the suspension is held not to be valid after
21
OA No. 3652/2022
Item No. 10
expiry of more than three months. In the present case, more
than one year has elapsed. The respondents are at liberty to pass
fresh orders against the applicant and initiate the departmental
proceedings after CBI files fresh charge sheet after finishing the
preliminary enquiry for which fifteen days time was granted by
the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, which has also elapsed.
State Of Jharkhand & Ors vs Jitendra Kumar Srivastava & Anr on 14 August, 2013
It
is needless to say that the applicant is required to be considered
for provisional pension and other pensionary benefits in terms
of Apex Court judgment in Jitendra Kumar Srivastava
(supra).
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
1