Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.63 seconds)
The New India Assurance Com Ltd vs Chand Mohd. And Anr on 26 September, 2019 cites

Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs Srinivas Sabata And Anr on 4 December, 1975

6.7 Learned counsel for the respondents/claimants have relied upon the judgment of North East Karnataka Road (Downloaded on 05/06/2021 at 02:13:07 PM) (21 of 24) [CMA-753/2006] Transport Corporation vs. Smt. Sujatha reported in MACD 2019(1) (SC) 19, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that the judgments of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Mubasir Ahmed & Anr. reported in (2007) 2 SCC 349 and Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Mohd. Nasir and another (supra) have been declared per incuriam and the law laid down in Pratap Narain Singh's case (supra) has been held as correct law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 944 - P N Shinghal - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Mohd. Nasir & Anr on 12 May, 2009

The best examples of co-relation between the employment and injury could be amputated leg and driver's job, amputated hand and tailor's and plumber's job etc. The precedent law cited by the learned counsel for the respondents/claimants including Pratap Narain Singh (4 Judge Bench Judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court) (supra), K. Janardan (supra), Lal Singh Rajput (supra), Chandi Dan Charan (supra), Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company (supra), Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. (supra) and North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (supra) are directly holding the field and the only judgment which gave strength to the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the insurance companies namely, Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Mohd. Nasir and another (supra) has been held to be per incuriam by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 349 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next