23. Yet, again in Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission through its Chairman and another vs. Rahul Singh and another, (2018) 7 SCC 254, the Apex Court reiterated the principles laid down in Kanpur University vs. Samir Gupta, (1983) 4 SCC 309 to observe as under in paragraph nos.12 to 14:
(iii) The above appointments will be made against the advertised vacancies on the post of Trained Graduate Teachers. The persons already appointed in service shall not be made to suffer in any manner, except to the extent one or more of the petitioners on account of increase in his total marks is required to be appointed and in that case, persons last in merit would have to suffer and their appointments, if already made, shall be terminated. I am constrained to give this direction for the reason that vacancies of Teachers advertised for selection are pursuant to requisitions received from the individual secondary institutions and, therefore, only those vacancies which were requisitioned and advertised in the above selection can be made to be governed by this judgment and the subsequent and other vacancies not included in the above selection cannot be taken into consideration to give benefit to any of petitioners by protecting the appointments already made.