Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.67 seconds)Section 11 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Bharat Broadband Network Limited vs United Telecoms Limited on 16 April, 2019
33. Following the law laid down in Bharat Broadband (supra) several
other judgment(s) have been passed by this Court, on similar lines.
Govind Singh vs M/S Satya Group Pvt Ltd And Anr on 6 January, 2023
Reliance is placed on Govind Singh vs Satya Group Pvt. Limited and
Another2023 SCC OnLine Del 37 and A K Builders vs Delhi State
Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd O.M.P. (T)
(COMM.) 12/2022.
Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc vs Hscc (India) Limited on 26 November, 2019
51. Even though it has been mandated that the judgment of Central
Organisation (supra) is to have prospective effect, the said judgment
has further crystallized the law of neutrality as laid down in Perkins
(supra) and Voestalpine (supra). The fact of the matter remains that in
the present case, there was no waiver, no consent and the respondent
unilaterally appointed the Arbitral Tribunal.
Trf Ltd. vs Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. & Anr. on 17 February, 2017
TRF (supra) and Perkins (supra) have been
relied upon by this Court on numerous occasions, including
in Glock Asia-Pacific Limited v. Union of India245 and
Lombardi Engg Ltd. v. Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.
......
Central Organisation For Railway ... vs M/S Eci Spic Smo Mcml (Jv) A Joint Venture ... on 17 December, 2019
50. The issue in question has further been settled by the Hon‟ble Supreme
Court in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs ECI
SPIC SMO MCML (JV) A Joint Venture Company 2024 SCC
OnLine SC 3219 wherein it was inter alia held as under: