Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.67 seconds)
Velugupudi Anitha vs Bandarupalli Checha Rao 3 Others on 24 March, 2022 cites

Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010

13. It is the contention of the learned Counsel for the claimant that as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh and others1 the claimant is entitled an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- towards consortium, but the Tribunal failed to award any amount under the head of consortium. It is also the contention of the learned Counsel for the claimant that the Tribunal erred in apportioning only meager amount of Rs.3,00,000/- towards the share of the claimant.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 5161 - R Bindal - Full Document

United India Insurance Company Limited vs Eda Anjanamma And Ors. on 22 August, 2003

38. It is one of the major factors to be taken into consideration, while apportioning the compensation, between the petitioner and the 4th respondent. It cannot be denied that both of them are entitled for the compensation, together, being the dependants on the deceased. However, such dependency, in case of the petitioner should be restricted only for the period of her remaining unmarried, as rightly contended, on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Reliance is placed, in this respect, on behalf of the 2nd respondent, in case of United India Insurance Company Limited, Kurnool v. Eda Anjanamma and others {(2004) 1 T.A.C. 688 (A.P.)}.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1