Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.63 seconds)

State Of Uttar Pradesh Etc vs Smt. Ram Kumari Devi Etc on 15 February, 1996

The Court held that appurtenance had a distinct and different meaning as to what would be necessary for the enjoyment and used for the purpose of the building would be appurtenant land. It quoted the definition of appurtenance in relation to a dwelling or to school or college which would include land occupied by it and used for the purpose thereof. The Court further clarified that if some other purpose would be fulfilled by the building and the land then it would not fall within the expression appurtenance. The Court further held that in short the touch stone of appurtenance is dependence of the building on what pertains to it for its use as a building.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 293 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1   2 3 Next