Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.28 seconds)
Kalaichelvan @ Dhanush K.Raja vs R. Kathiresan on 21 April, 2017 cites

State Of Orissa vs Debendra Nath Padhi on 29 November, 2004

In State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Pati [2004 AIR SCW 6813], the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the High Court in exercise of its powers Article 227 of the Constitution of India and u/s.482 Cr.P.C., can look into documents, which are unimpeachable and of sterling quality. In the considered opinion of this Court, the original Censor Board certificate given for Thulluvadho Ilamai, the original of which was submitted to this Court is a document of unimpeachable and sterling quality. To say that, after the Censor Board had issued the certificate, the lead Actor in the film was changed and Kalaichelvan was made to adorn the role by changing his name as Dhaunush and thereafter, the movie was released in the year 2003 is too large a pill for any prudent man to swallow. Even giving the benefit of this doubt to the Kathiresan couple, where were they when Dhanush married Aiswarya, D/o Rajinikanth in the year 2004?. It is not their pleading that they had received some money from Dhanush to keep silent and that they remained silent for his welfare and now that they have become penurious, they are seeking maintenance from him. Had they pleaded so, then, this Court could relegate the matter to the Trial Court for a decision. Unfortunately, the Kathiresan couple has levelled a very uncharitable allegation against Dhanush in their affidavit dated 07.02.2017 filed before this Court which reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 1174 - Full Document
1   2 Next