Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)
Shilpa Steel & Power Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise-Nagpur on 4 December, 2023 cites

Balaji Steel Re-Rolling Mills vs C.C.E.& Customs on 14 November, 2014

3. During the course of hearing of the appeals, learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Saurabh Bhise submitted that issue has been settled at rest by this Tribunal in the Appellant's own case for the prior period from April, 2007 to December, 2010 which has been reported in 2014 (307) ELT 915 (T). Also in the Final Order No. A/85854/2023 dated 03.04.2023 covering another period namely April, 2004 to March, 2007, in which basing on the decision of this Tribunal and decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in the case of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs. CCE as reported in 2010 (260) ELT A84 (S.C.) demand has been set aside and in the other appeal, the period of dispute relates to January, 2011 to October, 2012, during which period, Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 has already been brought into the statute book.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 34 - R K Agrawal - Full Document

M/S Srf Ltd vs C.C.E., Jaipur-I on 11 September, 2015

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 96 - Full Document

Standard Drum &Amp; Barrel Mfg. Co. vs Cce Mumbai - Ii on 28 June, 2018

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Automotive Stampings And Assemblies ... vs Cce Pune I on 17 May, 2019

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. General Engineering Works vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Jaipur on 8 February, 2001

In response to such submissions, learned Authorised Representative for the Respondent-Department Mr. P.K. Acharya argued in support of the reasoning and rationality of the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and has drawn our attention to the impugned order stating that placing reliance on the decision of Jay Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad reported in 1996 (12) TMI 206 - CEGAT, MADRAS, General Engineering Works Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur reported in 2005-TIOL-187-SC-CX and Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Vs. Lloyds Steels Inds. Ltd. reported in 2005 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court, the Commissioner (Appeals) had passed the order for which interference by the Tribunal in the order so passed is uncalled for.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

M/S Ghatge Patil Industries Ltd vs Cce, Pune on 6 August, 2014

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ad-Manum Packaging Ltd vs Cce, Indore on 16 August, 2016

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... vs M/S. Welding Specialities (I) P. Ltd on 26 September, 2016

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Central Excise vs M/S. Raja Magnetics Ltd on 8 July, 2009

6. We have gone through the case record and took note of the submissions. We must bring it on record that plethora of decision being passed after the judgment of R.R. Rolling Mills Ltd. in which consistent findings was that value of scrap need not be included in the assessable value and Appellant had rightly placed the following judgments namely SRF Limited Vs. CCE reported in 2007 (220) ELT 201 (T) Affirmed by Supreme Court at 2016 (331) ELT A138 (SC), Ghatge Patil Industries Vs. CCE reported in 2015 (320) ELT 646 (T), Automotive Stampings and Assemblies Vs. CCE reported in 2019 (5) TMI 1169-CESTAT MUMBAI, Ad-manum Packaging Vs. CCE reported in 2016 (341) ELT 348 (T), CCE Vs. Reelamation Welding Limited reported in 2014 (308) ELT 542 (T), CCE Vs. Raja Magnetic Limited reported in 2017-TIOL-1420-CESTAT-BANG, Standard Drums and Barrels Vs. CCE vide Final Order Nos.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next