Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Section 9 in Andhra Pradesh Higher Education Regulatory and Monitoring Commission Act, 2019 [Entire Act]
Medical Council Of India vs N.C. Medical College And Hospital on 13 September, 2018
The impugned letter dated 28.11.2020
shows that it is based on deficiency report and approval process handbook
and not under Act 20 of 2019. The contention of the learned counsel that
Section 9 of Act 20 of 2019 does not empower the fifth respondent to
keep the second petitioner under Zero Admission Category does not merit
consideration, because the impugned letter is not issued under Section 9
of the said Act, which deals with powers of the Commission established
under the said Act. In the present case, the impugned letters are issued
by the affiliating authority i.e., the fifth respondent University. And with
regard to report of the fact finding committee of the University, this Court
is of the prima facie opinion that a detailed examination of the said report
is not permitted as the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a decision reported in
Medical Council of India v. N.C. Medical College and Hospital?,
held as follows.
Medical Council Of India vs Kalinga Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 6 May, 2016
18. On the one hand, the High Court has doubted
the report of inspection and for that surprisingly relied
on the self-serving contents of the website of the
college. There is nothing to vouch for the authenticity of
1 2019(11) SCC 738
16
the website information. It is not what the institution
asserts. on website but what is actually found on
inspection, that has to be considered by the court and
while exercising judicial review it is settled law that
court cannot sit in appeal over the report of the
assessors as observed in Medical Council of India v.
Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), (2016) 11
SCC 530 thus :
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Andhra Pradesh Higher Education Regulatory and Monitoring Commission Act, 2019
1