Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.63 seconds)

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 March, 2014

With regard to the issue of utilization of environmental funds, we find that the application for approval was filed by the State PCB on 13.10.2020 and the approval was granted on 14.10.2020. It is not clear whether the proposal received full attention, considering details of different heads such as Environmental Surveillance Cell. It may thus be necessary that the CPCB revisits the subject and grant its approval after due appraisal by the Chairman and the Member Secretary, considering the details and the observations in para 4 in the order of this Tribunal dated 24.07.2020 quoted above in para 6, namely hiring of Experts, undertaking remediation and study of the contaminated sites and allied issues. These observations are based on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in T.N. Godavarman v. UOI, (2014) 6 SCC 150. The CPCB may also consider the details of expenditure to be incurred for the District Environment Plans and priority to be accorded to different items of expenditure, with funds being limited. Focus of utilization of EC funds should primarily be for remediation/restitution of environment."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

M/S. Goel Ganga Developers India Pvt. ... vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 10 August, 2018

By completing the construction of the project, the appellant denied the third and fourth respondents the ability to evaluate the environmental impact and suggest methods to mitigate any environmental damage Goel Ganga Developers India (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, (2018) 18 SCC 257 1 (2018) 18 SCC 257 2 (2020) 2 SCC 66 3 2020 SCC OnLine SC 347 7 Having held so we are definitely of the view that the project proponent who has violated law with impunity cannot be allowed to go scot-free.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 125 - D Gupta - Full Document

Karnataka State Pollution Control ... vs The General Secretary Karnataka State ... on 29 November, 2019

It is submitted that the Hon'ble NGT vide order dated 22.01.2019 in O.A. No 101/2019 in the matter of Central Pollution Control Board Vs. Assam State Pollution Control Board & Ors, has 10 granted approval for utilization of 25% Environmental Compensation Fund (hereinafter referred to as EC Fund) for specified activities in line with "Guidelines for Utilization of EC Fund" prepared by CPCB.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Shree Nath Sharma vs Union Of India on 8 February, 2022

7. Consistent with the above directions, we direct that updated action plans be got prepared and executed by the Chief Secretaries of all States/UTs. The recovered compensation may be credited to a separate account under the Chief Secretary and used as per said plans only. This will apply to compensation deposited with the State PCBs/PCCs and also other regulators such as SEIAAs, Water Resource Authorities etc. The utilisation plans may be in sync with State/District Environment Plans, in pursuance of order of this Tribunal dated 26.09.2019 in OA No. 360/2018, Shree Nath Sharma vs. Union of India & Ors. The process of planning and execution for utilistion of such funds may be preferably entrusted to a high powered Committee of three Additional Chief Secretaries, identified by the Chief Secretary within one month. Such plans and progress in execution may be placed on websites of the States/UTs after every six months. A part of funds be provided for environment awareness through eco clubs in all Schools and Colleges upto grassroot levels in the State through the education Departments. States/UTs may also coordinate with Legal Services Authorities, if viable."
National Green Tribunal Cites 40 - Cited by 16 - A K Goel - Full Document

Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs Rohit Prajapati . on 1 April, 2020

"Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Rohit Prajapati, (2020) 17 SCC 157 ......The three industries have evaded the legally binding regime of obtaining ECs. They cannot escape the liability incurred on account of such non-compliance. Penalties must be imposed for the disobedience with a binding legal regime. The breach by the industries cannot be left unattended by legal consequences. The amount should be used for the purpose of restitution and restoration of the environment. Instead and in place of the directions issued by NGT, we are of the view that it would be in the interests of justice to direct the three industries to deposit compensation quantified at Rs 10 crores each. The amount shall be deposited with GPCB and it shall be duly utilised for restoration and remedial measures to improve the quality of the environment in the industrial area in which the industries operate.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 67 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Rajiv Narayan vs Union Of India on 29 January, 2021

20(viii), Order dated 26.08.2019, OA 804/2017, Rajiv Narayan v. Union of India & Ors. 8 & 9, Order dated 15.07.2019, OA 710/2017, Shailesh Singh v. Sheela Hospital & Trauma Center 9 within two months. All other State PCBs and PCCs may also prepare similar action plans for restoration of environment and implementation of District Environment Plans, in coordination with CPCB. CPCB may also prepare such plan for utilization of funds available with it. CPCB may file compliance report to this effect within four months by e-mail at judicial- [email protected] preferably in the form of searchable PDF/ OCR Support PDF and not in the form of Image PDF."
National Green Tribunal Cites 10 - Cited by 18 - A K Goel - Full Document

Shailesh Singh vs Sheela Hospital And Trauma Centre on 17 May, 2018

20(viii), Order dated 26.08.2019, OA 804/2017, Rajiv Narayan v. Union of India & Ors. 8 & 9, Order dated 15.07.2019, OA 710/2017, Shailesh Singh v. Sheela Hospital & Trauma Center 9 within two months. All other State PCBs and PCCs may also prepare similar action plans for restoration of environment and implementation of District Environment Plans, in coordination with CPCB. CPCB may also prepare such plan for utilization of funds available with it. CPCB may file compliance report to this effect within four months by e-mail at judicial- [email protected] preferably in the form of searchable PDF/ OCR Support PDF and not in the form of Image PDF."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 54 - Full Document
1   2 Next