Mr. R.D. Hattangadi vs M/S Pest Control (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 6 January, 1995
14.1 In R.D Hattangadi v. Pest Control (India) (P) Ltd. It
was observed:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.27 seconds)Baby Sakshi Greola vs Manzoor Ahmad Simon on 24 April, 2018
No amount of compensation would be sufficient
for the amount of pain and suffering that the young boy will
have to undergo for the rest of his life. Accordingly, keeping in
view the principles laid down in Baby Sakshi Greola's case
(supra), the compensation qua pain and suffering is assessed as
13 of 15
::: Downloaded on - 14-02-2026 01:06:12 :::
FAO-3440-2024 (O&M) -14-
Rs.15 lakhs.
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010
In Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar [Raj Kumar v. Ajay
Kumar, (2011) 1 SCC 343 (2011) 1 SCC (Civ) 164 (2011) 1 SCC
(Cri) 1161], this Court laid down the heads under which
compensation is to be awarded for personal injuries: (SCC p. 348,
para 6)
"6. The heads under which compensation is
awarded in personal Injury cases are the following:
K. Suresh vs New India Assurance Co.Ltd & Anr on 19 October, 2012
23. Recently, this Court in the case of K.S. Muralidhar (supra) on an
elaborate consideration of certain authorities (scholarly as also judicial)
on the aspect of "pain and suffering" set out the contours. It would be
relevant to refer to the following paragraphs of the said case:
Sidram vs The Divisional Manager United India ... on 16 November, 2022
(Emphasis Supplied)
14.2 This Judgment was recently referred to by this Court
in Sidram v. United India Insurance Company Ltd. reference was
also made to Karnataka SRTC v. Mahadeva Shetty (irrespective
of the percentage of disability incurred, the observations are
instructive), wherein it was observed:
Kajal vs Jagdish Chand on 5 February, 2020
14.4 In Ayush v. Reliance General Insurance relying on
Kajal (supra) the amount awarded in 'pain and suffering' was
enhanced to Rs. 10,00,000. The child who had suffered the
accident was five years old and the Court noted in paragraph 2
that: