Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.47 seconds)Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Workmen Of Cochin Port Trust vs Board Of Trustees Of The Cochin Port ... on 5 May, 1978
In Workmen v. Board of Trustee of Cochin Port
Trust , the court made certain important observations, which
may be relevance. Hence, they are quoted as follows:
The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors on 16 January, 1996
47. As pointed out by the Supreme Court in State of
Punjab v. Gurmit Singh , victims of sexual harassment
cannot be made to undergo a test of fire about their past
conduct. It was observed by the Supreme Court in the said
decision that even if the prosecutrix, in a given case, has been
promiscuous in her sexual behaviour earlier, she cannot be
made a prey for any one and everyone. Therefore, the
observations made in the judgment of this Court in the
Criminal Appeal filed by the Judicial Officer, about the
consent of the petitioner, cannot form the basis for the
disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. As pointed out
by the Supreme Court in Gurmit Singh, a woman subjected
to sexual assault is not to be treated as an accomplice, but a
victim.
Daryao And Others vs The State Of U. P. And Others(And ... on 27 March, 1961
33. As pointed out by the Constitution Bench of the
Supreme Court in Daryao v. State of U.P. , the rule of res
judicata is founded upon considerations of public policy. Two
principles namely (i) that finality should attach to binding
decisions of courts and (ii) that individuals should not be
vexed twice over the same cause, were held to form the
foundation of the rule of res judicata.
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 5 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Amalgamated Coalfields Ltd. And ... vs The Janapada Sabha, Chhindwara (And ... on 10 February, 1961
34. But, in Amalgamated Coal Fields Limited v.
Janapadha Sabha , a Constitution Bench warned that
special and original forms of res judicata such as constructive
res judicata propounded in Section 11 of the Code of Civil
Procedure should not generally be applied to writ petitions
under Article 32 or 226.