Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.37 seconds)
Janardan Singh & Ors vs Sidheshwar Singh & Ors on 30 April, 2018 cites

Thomson Press (India) Ltd vs Nanak Builders & Investrs.P.Ltd & Ors on 21 February, 2013

The Supreme Patna High Court CWJC No.491 of 2012 dt.30-04-2018 5/5 Court in paragraph 55 of the said judgment (Thomson Press (India) Ltd. Vs. Nanak Builders and Investors Private Limited & Ors.) has observed that any such heirs, legatee or transferee could not be turned away when he applies for being added as a party to the suit. While summing up, the Supreme Court held, in the facts and circumstances of that case, that as the transferee had purchased the entire estate, he was entitled to be added as party (defendant) to the suit. However, as a result of his addition, Court held in that case, the appellant should raise and pursue only such defences as are available and taken by the original defendants and not other.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 385 - M Y Eqbal - Full Document

Khemchand Shankar Choudharyand ... vs Vishnu Hari Patil And Others on 3 December, 1982

The Supreme Court in that case quoted with approval previous Supreme Court judgment in case of Khemchand Shankar Choudhari vs. Vishnu Hari Patil reported in (1983) 1 SCC 18 to the effect that the position of a person on whom any interest has devolved on account of a transfer during pendency of a suit or a proceeding is somewhat similar to the position of an heir or legatee of a party who dies during the pendency of the suit or proceeding.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 124 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Md. Kamaluddin vs Laxmi Devi & Ors. on 12 July, 2011

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are bona fide purchasers from Suba Singh who was admittedly one of the co-sharers. The said Suba Singh had executed two sale deeds in favour of Lalmuni Devi with respect to 1.83 decimal land of plot Nos. 173, 174, 194 and 195. On the prayer of plaintiffs, the said Lalmuni Devi was impleaded as defendant to the suit. The case of these petitioners stands on similar footing as they also purchased the land from Suba Singh. After death of Suba Singh, the petitioners have become necessary party to the suit to protect their interest in view of settled principles of law as laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in 2014 (2) P.L.J.R. 125 (Md. Kamaluddin Vs. Laxmi Devi & Ors.).
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1