Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (1.04 seconds)
Raja Kumar vs State on 12 August, 2025 cites

Raj Kumar @ Raja vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 30 July, 2018

(f) Because IO failed to record the arrival and departure entries of the witnesses in the Daily Diary; caller of the PCR call was not documented; arrest of the appellant was not entered in Register No.5; medical examination of the prosecutrix was not conducted; clothes of prosecutrix were not seized; evidence of tenancy was not obtained; IO neither recorded the statement of the landlord or security guard or caretaker nor obtained CA No. 140/25 Raja Kumar Vs. State. Page No. 4 of 21. Digitally signed by SHIVALI SHIVALI BANSAL BANSAL Date:
Delhi High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 5 - P S Teji - Full Document

Dhanaj Singh @ Shera And Ors vs State Of Punjab on 10 March, 2004

15. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed the present appeal on the ground that there was faulty investigation by the police officers. It is stated that the police officials have failed to collect evidence like call detail records and location data of the appellant, medical examination of the complainant was not conducted, clothes of complainant were not seized, evidence of tenancy was not obtained etc. It is well settled that the defect in the investigation by itself cannot be a ground for acquittal and if primacy is given to such design or negligent investigation or to the omissions or lapses by perfunctory investigation, the faith and confidence of the people in the criminal justice administrated would be eroded. The consequence of defective investigation have been elaborated in Dhanaj Singh @ Shera And Ors vs State Of Punjab, (2004) 3 SCC 654, wherein it was observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 371 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next