Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.49 seconds)
North Eastern Hill University ... vs Union Of India And Others on 20 December, 2017 cites

N.K. Singh vs Union Of India on 25 August, 1994

The decisions in the cases of N.K. Singh and Naseem Bano (supra) on the requirement of specific counter averments as regards allegation of mala fide do not make out a case for any finding against the respondent No.4. In the given set of facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court finds no reason to accept the contention that there had been any manipulation or mala fide intent on the part of the respondent No.4 Vice Chancellor.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 512 - J S Verma - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Singhara Singh And Others on 16 August, 1963

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the suggestion that repeal has not been carried out in the manner prescribed by the statute also does not make out a case for interference. There is not and there cannot be any quarrel with the basic proposition that when a particular action is required by the statute to be taken in a particular manner, the prescribed manner is to be followed as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Ambay Cements and Singhara Singh (supra). However, the said decisions do not make out a case for interference because the scheme of statute is required to be read as a whole; and when there are overriding powers available with the Visitor, the same cannot be ignored. Question No.(iii) is also answered against the petitioners.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 785 - A K Sarkar - Full Document
1