cites: 176299450

THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 6613

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

Hans Raj Kalra vs Kishan Lal Kalra And Ors. on 2 August, 1976

18. It is well settled that the plaintiff is dominus litis and in him vests the power to choose the court and determine the valuation of the suit for purposes of pecuniary jurisdiction and that the defendant cannot insist that the suit be tried before a particular court. Nor can the courts compel the O.A. 22/2016 in CS(OS) 3275/2014 Page 11 of 15 plaintiff to go to another court or interfere with his valuation of the suit. [Ref.: Hans Raj Kalra vs. Kishan Lal Kalra, (1976) ILR 2 Delhi 745; Indian Overseas Bank, Madras vs. Chemical Construction Company and Ors. (1979) 4 SCC 358; Govind Gopal & Ors. vs. Banwari Lal AIR 1983 Del 323; Md. Alam and etc.

Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Indian Overseas Bank, Madras vs Chemical Construction Company & Ors on 3 May, 1979

18. It is well settled that the plaintiff is dominus litis and in him vests the power to choose the court and determine the valuation of the suit for purposes of pecuniary jurisdiction and that the defendant cannot insist that the suit be tried before a particular court. Nor can the courts compel the O.A. 22/2016 in CS(OS) 3275/2014 Page 11 of 15 plaintiff to go to another court or interfere with his valuation of the suit. [Ref.: Hans Raj Kalra vs. Kishan Lal Kalra, (1976) ILR 2 Delhi 745; Indian Overseas Bank, Madras vs. Chemical Construction Company and Ors. (1979) 4 SCC 358; Govind Gopal & Ors. vs. Banwari Lal AIR 1983 Del 323; Md. Alam and etc.

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 64 - R S Sarkaria - Full Document

Govind Gopal And Ors. vs Banwari Lal on 18 October, 1982

18. It is well settled that the plaintiff is dominus litis and in him vests the power to choose the court and determine the valuation of the suit for purposes of pecuniary jurisdiction and that the defendant cannot insist that the suit be tried before a particular court. Nor can the courts compel the O.A. 22/2016 in CS(OS) 3275/2014 Page 11 of 15 plaintiff to go to another court or interfere with his valuation of the suit. [Ref.: Hans Raj Kalra vs. Kishan Lal Kalra, (1976) ILR 2 Delhi 745; Indian Overseas Bank, Madras vs. Chemical Construction Company and Ors. (1979) 4 SCC 358; Govind Gopal & Ors. vs. Banwari Lal AIR 1983 Del 323; Md. Alam and etc.

Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 9 - Full Document