Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)Section 4 in The Chhattisgarh Tonahi Pratadna Nivaran Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Shyam Babu Sah @ Shyamjee Sah vs State Of Bihar on 6 January, 2015
15. It is true that eyewitnesses of the incident i.e. PW-2 & PW-5, are
daughter and daughter-in-law of injured (PW-1) respectively. Out
of these two eyewitnesses, PW-2 is an injured eyewitness.
-9-
Nothing has been brought on record by applicants as to why
these two witnesses were not stating truth and trying to falsely
implicate them. No evidence was led of having any animosity
between them prior to incident. Most importantly, the applicants
in their statement recorded under Section 313 CrPC have simply
stated that they were falsely implicated, but they have not
disclosed the reason for their false implication. The credibility of
an injured related witness was considered in case of Shyam
Babu vs. State of Bihar, reported in (2012) 8 SCC 651
observing as follows :-
1