Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)
Surender Kumar vs Delhi Jal Board, Govt. Of Nctd on 24 September, 2018 cites

Kunwar Pal Singh & Ors. vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors. on 3 January, 2013

The appointment of the applicants therein is the result of the same exam and that it was just a matter of chance that the issuance of appointment letters in favour of the applicant in OA were withheld on account of pendency of LPA-625/2002 filed by Government of Delhi against the decision in CWP No. 5061/2001 (Kunwar Pal & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi). The applicants were disabled for appointment on account of the pendency of the LPA, and not because of any delay on their part.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 16 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Sh. Yogesh Kumar vs M.C.D. And Other Through on 11 February, 2011

9. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the applicants Sh. M.K. Bhardwaj emphasized the facts raised in the OA and relied upon a large number of judgments where the issue has been decided favouraly in favour of other similarly situated persons. He submitted that the applicants are similarly situated like the applicants in OA-3719/2009 (Yogesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. MCD & Ors.) decided on 11.02.2011.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1