Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (1.14 seconds)Section 3 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [Entire Act]
Section 377 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 101 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [Entire Act]
Imtiaz Ahmad Son Of Late Faiyaz Ahmad vs The Regional Deputy Director Of Census ... on 12 January, 2007
The judgement and order dated 23.5.2019, passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Siddarth Nagar in Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2019 (Faiz Ahmad v. State of U.P.and others) under section 101 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 by which the District & Sessions Judge, Siddarth Nagar rejected the Second Criminal Appeal of the Revisionist and the order dated 18.12.2018 passed by the Member, Juvenile Justice Board Siddharth Nagar and Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Siddarth Nagar in Suit No. 24 of 2018 (State v. Fair Ahmad) in Case Crime No. 208 of 2018 under section 377 IPC and under section 3/4 of POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station -Banshi, District- Siddharth Nagar, are set-aside.
State Of U.P. vs Kallu Faqir @ Rukhshar Ahmad on 9 July, 2010
The judgement and order dated 23.5.2019, passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Siddarth Nagar in Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2019 (Faiz Ahmad v. State of U.P.and others) under section 101 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 by which the District & Sessions Judge, Siddarth Nagar rejected the Second Criminal Appeal of the Revisionist and the order dated 18.12.2018 passed by the Member, Juvenile Justice Board Siddharth Nagar and Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Siddarth Nagar in Suit No. 24 of 2018 (State v. Fair Ahmad) in Case Crime No. 208 of 2018 under section 377 IPC and under section 3/4 of POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station -Banshi, District- Siddharth Nagar, are set-aside.
Section 102 in The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 [Entire Act]
The State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Fayaz Ahmad Banday on 12 July, 2019
The revisionist Faiz Ahmad @ Faiz, son of Ushman, resident of Village- Dhandhapaar, Police Station Basi, Districtd- Siddharth Nagar, involved in the aforesaid case Suit No. 24 of 2018 (State v. Faiz Ahmad) in Case Crime No. 208 of 2018 under section 377 IPC and under section 3/4 of POCSO Act, 2012, Police Station -Banshi, District- Siddharth Nagar. be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond through his legal guardian and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Board concerned.
1