Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.27 seconds)
Yeestdev Dewangan vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 1 February, 2023 cites

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Bhupesh Kumar & Ors on 18 June, 2018

In support of his submission learned counsel for the PSC has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Union public service commission Vs. M. Sathiya Priya 4, Bihar Public service commission & others Vs. Kamini & Others 5, University of Mysore Vs. Govinda Rao 6, M.H. State Board of secondary & Higher education & Ors. Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Speth etc.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 17 - A K Tripathi - Full Document

Vice Chancellor And Anr vs Dr. Shyam Bihari Gupta (Associate ... on 8 May, 2015

In Kanpur University, through Vice Chancellor and Others vs. Samir Gupta and Others 1, this Court was dealing with a case relating to the Combined Pre Medical Test. Admittedly, the examination setter himself had provided the key answers and there were no committees to moderate or verify the correctness of the key answers provided by the examiner. This Court upheld the view of the Allahabad High Court that the students had proved that 3 of the key answers were wrong. Following observations of the Court are pertinent:-
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 60 - N Sinha - Full Document

Ranvijay Singh And 7 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 29 March, 2018

17. Considering the submission and considering the exercise carried out by the expert committee of the subject the well settled preposition of law that this court cannot at all reevaluate or scrutinise the answer sheet of a candidate, as it has no expertise in the matter and academic matters are best left to the academics and this court should presume the correctness of the key answers and proceed on that assumptions, even if there is a doubt the benefit should be given to the examination authority rather than to the candidates. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Ranvijay Singh vs. State of U.P. 10 at para 32 has held as under :-
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 45 - D B Bhosale - Full Document

U.P. Public Service Commission vs Alpana on 17 January, 1994

In U.P Public Service Commission v. Alpana 1994 2 SCC 723, this Court, after considering a large number of its earlier judgments, held that eligibility conditions should be examined as on the last date for receipt of applications by the Commission. That too was a case where the result of a candidate was declared subsequent to the last date of submission of the applications. This Court held that as the result does not relate back to the date of examination and eligibility of the candidate is to be considered on the last date of submission of applications, therefore, a candidate, whose result has not been declared up to the last date of submission of applications, would not be eligible.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 192 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next