Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.34 seconds)Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 378 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 386 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 481 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mallappa Siddappa Alakanur & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2009
acquittal, interference must be limited. If two reasonable
views are possible on the basis of the record, the acquittal
should not be disturbed. Judicial intervention is only
warranted where the Trial Court's view is perverse, based
on misreading or ignoring material evidence, or results in
a manifest miscarriage of justice. Moreover, the Appellate
Court must address the reasons given by the Trial Court
of
for acquittal before reversing it and assigning its own. A
catena of the recent judgments of this Court has more
firmly entrenched this position, including, inter alia,
rt
Mallappa v. State of Karnataka 2024 INSC 104, Ballu @
Balram @ Balmukund v. The State of Madhya Pradesh 2024
INSC 258, Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar v. State of
Karnataka 2024 INSC 320, and Constable 907 Surendra
Singh v. State of Uttarakhand 2025 INSC 114."