Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.29 seconds)Section 397 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 398 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 242 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Section 402 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 402 in The Companies Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
Maharani Lalita Rajya Lakshmi M.P. vs Indian Motor Co., (Hazaribagh) Ltd. And ... on 10 May, 1961
5. Further in Maharani Lalita Rajya Lakshmi Vs Indian Motor Co
(Hazaribagh) Ltd & ors 1961 SCC OnLine Cal 179 the Court held:-
M.S.D.C. Radharamanan vs M.S.D. Chandrasekara Raja And Another on 14 March, 2008
In Case (iii) is a judgment passed by the Hon'ble Calcutta High
Court before the law was laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Radharamanan's Case and Mistry's Case.
Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad & Ors vs Shantadevi P. Gaekwad (Dead)Thr.Lrs. & ... on 20 January, 2005
In Radharamanan's case (paragraph 42), the Hon'ble Supreme Court
referred to Samgramsinh P. Gaekwad vs. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad [(2005) 11
SCC 314], wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held in a given case the court
despite holding that no case of oppression has been made out may grant such
relief so as to do substantial justice between parties.
Tata Consultancy Services Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd on 26 March, 2021
13. Further in Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd.
and Ors. [2021 (9) SCC 449] ('Mistry's Case'), the Court observed in para 291
10
that as we have pointed out elsewhere a divorce without acrimony is what is
encouraged both in England and in India under the statutory regime.