Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)Badri Narain Jha And Others vs Rameshwar Dayal Singh And Others on 5 February, 1951
In Badri Narain Jha v. Rameshwar Dayal Singh , it was held by this Court that if the lessor purchases the lessee's interest, the lease no doubt is extinguished as the same man cannot at the same time be both a landlord and a tenant, but there is no extinction of the lease if one of the several lessees purchased only a part of the lessor's interest. In such a case the leasehold and the (sic).
The Andhra Bank Ltd vs R. Srinivasan And Others on 31 August, 1961
In The Aadhra Bank Ltd. v. R. Srinivasan and Ors., this Court considered the question whether the legatee under the Will is the legal representative within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Code. It was held that it is well known that the expression "Legal Representative" had not been defined in the Code of 1882 and that led to a difference of judicial opinion as to its denotation. Considering the case law developed in that behalf it was held that respondents 2 to 12, the legatees under the Will of the estate are legal representatives of the deceased Raja Bahadur and so it follows that the estate of the deceased was sufficiently represented by them when the judgments were pronounced.
T.Lakshmipathi & Ors vs P.Nithyananda Reddy & Ors on 31 March, 2003
14. It is well settled that there cannot be a merger of the interest of lessee and lessor at the same time in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in T. Lakshmipathi and Ors. v. P. Nithyananda Reddy and Ors. , where it has been held as under:
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 111 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1