Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.28 seconds)

V. Sahadevan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 April, 2019

“30. Recently, in Sahadevan v. State of T.N., after referring to the rulings in Sk. Yusuf v. State of W.B. and Pancho v. State of Haryana, a two-Judge Bench has laid down that the extra-judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself and it has to be State of Haryana, a two-Judge Bench has _________________ 5 (2012) 6 SCC 403 6 (2012) 11 SCC 768 Criminal Appeal Nos.333-334 of 2017 Page 13 of 16 laid down that the extra-judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself and it has to be examined by the court with greater care and caution; that it should be made voluntarily and should be truthful; that it should inspire confidence; that an extra-judicial confession attains greater credibility and evidentiary value if it is supported by a chain of cogent circumstances and is further corroborated by other prosecution evidence; that for an extra-judicial confession to be the basis of conviction, it should not suffer from any material discrepancies and inherent improbabilities; and that such statement essentially has to be proved like any other fact and in accordance with law."
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 71 - Full Document

Pancho vs State Of Haryana on 20 October, 2011

“30. Recently, in Sahadevan v. State of T.N., after referring to the rulings in Sk. Yusuf v. State of W.B. and Pancho v. State of Haryana, a two-Judge Bench has laid down that the extra-judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself and it has to be State of Haryana, a two-Judge Bench has _________________ 5 (2012) 6 SCC 403 6 (2012) 11 SCC 768 Criminal Appeal Nos.333-334 of 2017 Page 13 of 16 laid down that the extra-judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself and it has to be examined by the court with greater care and caution; that it should be made voluntarily and should be truthful; that it should inspire confidence; that an extra-judicial confession attains greater credibility and evidentiary value if it is supported by a chain of cogent circumstances and is further corroborated by other prosecution evidence; that for an extra-judicial confession to be the basis of conviction, it should not suffer from any material discrepancies and inherent improbabilities; and that such statement essentially has to be proved like any other fact and in accordance with law."
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 97 - Full Document

Tota Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 April, 1987

In light of the aforesaid discussion, we allow the appeals and set aside the conviction and sentences of the appellants in the __________________________________________ 7 Tota Singh v. State of Punjab (1987) 2 SCC 529 8 Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415 Criminal Appeal Nos.333-334 of 2017 Page 15 of 16 charge-sheet arising from FIR No. 55/2001. The appellants are accordingly directed to be released from custody, unless they are required to be detained in any other case in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 151 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Sk. Yusuf vs State Of West Bengal on 14 June, 2011

“30. Recently, in Sahadevan v. State of T.N., after referring to the rulings in Sk. Yusuf v. State of W.B. and Pancho v. State of Haryana, a two-Judge Bench has laid down that the extra-judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself and it has to be State of Haryana, a two-Judge Bench has _________________ 5 (2012) 6 SCC 403 6 (2012) 11 SCC 768 Criminal Appeal Nos.333-334 of 2017 Page 13 of 16 laid down that the extra-judicial confession is a weak evidence by itself and it has to be examined by the court with greater care and caution; that it should be made voluntarily and should be truthful; that it should inspire confidence; that an extra-judicial confession attains greater credibility and evidentiary value if it is supported by a chain of cogent circumstances and is further corroborated by other prosecution evidence; that for an extra-judicial confession to be the basis of conviction, it should not suffer from any material discrepancies and inherent improbabilities; and that such statement essentially has to be proved like any other fact and in accordance with law."
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 258 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next