Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
State Of M.P. And Others vs Hazarilal on 12 February, 2008
It was further held in that order that the
conviction under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325 of IPC does not fall within the
definition of moral turpitude and in view of judgment of Apex Court in the
matter of State of M.P. and others vs. Hazarilal, reported in 2008 (3) SCC 273,
the services of the employee was continued and not terminated on the said
ground. In the present case, the conviction is only under Section 323/34 of IPC
and the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act has been extended to the
respondent No.2.
Rajpal Singh Nahar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 January, 2020
4. The aforesaid orders passed by the coordinate Bench are not helpful to the
petitioner as in the case of Rajpal Singh Nahar (supra), the petitioners therein
was convicted under Sections 148, 149, 323, 325 of IPC. However, the same
was not found sufficient by the Court to the termination of services on the basis
of conviction in criminal case.
Supa vs Deepa on 5 April, 2019
So far as the order passed in the case of Supa (supra), the
coordinate Bench has held that the appointing authority has to form opinion on
the basis of good character and antecedent of the candidate. In the present
matter, the appointing authority after considering the fact of conviction under
Section 323/34 of IPC, continued the appointment of the respondent No.2 and
therefore, the said order is also not helpful to the petitioner.
1