Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.35 seconds)
Prafulla Kumar Roy Chowdhury And Anr. vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. on 13 May, 2003 cites

Smt. Nandita Bose vs Ratanlal Nahata on 4 August, 1987

14. The question of Court fees must be considered in the light of the allegations made in the plaint. No material is placed before this Court to indicate arbitrariness or unreasonableness of the valuation put by the plaintiff and as such in view of ratio of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Nandita Bose (supra) and Tara Devi (supra) this Court has pecuniary jurisdiction to receive, try and determine the instant suit. This issue is accordingly decided in favour of the plaintiffs.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 48 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

A.K.A.Ct.V.Ct. Meenakshisundaram ... vs A.K.A.Ct.V.Ct. Venkatachalam ... on 23 February, 1979

"It is settled law that the plaintiff has the right to value the relief claimed according to his own estimation and such valuation has to be ordinarily accepted. Reference can be made in this context to Smt. Tara Deviv. Thakur Radha Krishna Maharaj, , Sathappa Chettiar v. Ramanathan Chettiar, as well as Meenakshisundaram Chettiar v. Venkatachalam Chettiar, ."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 88 - P S Kailasam - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next