Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.31 seconds)Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 141 in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 305 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ravindranatha Bajpe vs Mangalore Special Economic Zone Ltd. ... on 27 September, 2021
In the present case due to not arraigning the company i.e.
M/s H. S. Chaudhary Estate Pvt. Ltd. as an accused during the
trial, non-proving of active/specific role of appellant/convict with
criminal intent, no specific provision of vicarious liability in IPC,
contradictions and inconsistencies in the testimonies of star
witnesses of prosecution i.e. PW-20 Sh. Charanjeet Singh and
PW-40 Smt. Kanta Kapoor and the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in 'Aneeta Hada (supra), Sharad Kumar
Sanghi (supra) & 'Ravindranatha Bajpe (supra), serious doubts
have been created on the prosecution story and the evidence led
by the prosecution before the Ld. Trial Court and two views are
possible in the present case and hence the benefit of the same
must go to the appellant/convict.