Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.47 seconds)

Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 21 July, 1988

It may be noticed that the award passed by the learned reference court is based on the principles laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chimanlal Hargovinddas Vs. Special Land acquisition Officer, Poona and anr. (supra) except that post notifications cannot be the basis for determining the market value except to assess the potentiality of the land.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 832 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Firm Balwant Singh Jaswant Singh on 5 March, 1956

On consideration of matter, I find no force in the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellants. No reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai through his heirs and Legal Representatives and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat (supra); judgment in the case of Chimanlal Hargovinddas Vs. Special Land acquisition Officer, Poona and anr. (supra) or the RFA No. 3071 of 1993 26 judgment of this court in the case of Shri Tara Singh (deceased) Vs. The State of Punjab (supra) and Union of India Vs. Jaswant Singh (supra) for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V.G.Kulkarni Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (supra) has been pleased to lay down that the post notification transactions cannot be taken into consideration for determining the market value.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

V.G. Kulkarni vs The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer on 15 March, 1996

On consideration of matter, I find no force in the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellants. No reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai through his heirs and Legal Representatives and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat (supra); judgment in the case of Chimanlal Hargovinddas Vs. Special Land acquisition Officer, Poona and anr. (supra) or the RFA No. 3071 of 1993 26 judgment of this court in the case of Shri Tara Singh (deceased) Vs. The State of Punjab (supra) and Union of India Vs. Jaswant Singh (supra) for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V.G.Kulkarni Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (supra) has been pleased to lay down that the post notification transactions cannot be taken into consideration for determining the market value.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 37 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Mewa Ram (Deceased) By His L.Rs. And Ors vs State Of Haryana Through The ... on 26 August, 1986

This order shall dispose of RFA Nos. 3071 to 3073, 3412 to 3414, 3432, 3733 and 3734 of 1993 titled Siria Vs. The State of Haryana; Mohan Vs. The State of Haryana; Jeet Ram Vs. The State of Haryana; Prem Singh @ Prem Chand Vs. The State of Haryana; Tejja Vs. The State of RFA No. 3071 of 1993 2 Haryana; Ranjit Singh alias Jeet (dead) through his L.Rs. Vs. The State of Haryana; Pal Singh Vs. The State of Haryana; Kehar Singh Vs. The State of Haryana and Bachan Singh alias Gurbachan Singh (dead) represented by L.Rs. Vs. The State of Haryana, respectively, as common questions of law and facts are involved in these appeals and they arise out of the common award.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 285 - A P Sen - Full Document

Ibrahimbhai Karimbhai Chhipa ... vs State Of Gujarat on 4 May, 1967

On consideration of matter, I find no force in the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellants. No reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai through his heirs and Legal Representatives and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat (supra); judgment in the case of Chimanlal Hargovinddas Vs. Special Land acquisition Officer, Poona and anr. (supra) or the RFA No. 3071 of 1993 26 judgment of this court in the case of Shri Tara Singh (deceased) Vs. The State of Punjab (supra) and Union of India Vs. Jaswant Singh (supra) for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V.G.Kulkarni Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer (supra) has been pleased to lay down that the post notification transactions cannot be taken into consideration for determining the market value.
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Administrator General Of West Bengal vs Collector, Varanasi on 16 February, 1988

Reliance was also placed on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Administrative General of West Bengal Vs. Collector, Varansi 1988 (1) Recent Revenue Reports 480, wherein again Hon'ble Supreme Court was pleased to lay down that the subsequent sale transaction in the area can be looked into to see whether there was upper trend of the price of the land.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 332 - Full Document

Kanwar Pal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 24 September, 1992

This order shall dispose of RFA Nos. 3071 to 3073, 3412 to 3414, 3432, 3733 and 3734 of 1993 titled Siria Vs. The State of Haryana; Mohan Vs. The State of Haryana; Jeet Ram Vs. The State of Haryana; Prem Singh @ Prem Chand Vs. The State of Haryana; Tejja Vs. The State of RFA No. 3071 of 1993 2 Haryana; Ranjit Singh alias Jeet (dead) through his L.Rs. Vs. The State of Haryana; Pal Singh Vs. The State of Haryana; Kehar Singh Vs. The State of Haryana and Bachan Singh alias Gurbachan Singh (dead) represented by L.Rs. Vs. The State of Haryana, respectively, as common questions of law and facts are involved in these appeals and they arise out of the common award.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1   2 Next