Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.21 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 5 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Hindustan Zinc Limited (H.Z.L.) vs Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited on 4 December, 2019
● “Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) v. Ajmet Vidyut Vitran Nigam
Limited reported in (2019) 17 SCC 82” for the point that when the
award is passed with inherent lack of jurisdiction, the award is a
nullity and such plea can be taken up at any stage and also in
Page No.5/18
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.No.2686 of 2023
collateral proceedings. Even acquiescence to or participation in the
(non est) arbitration will not bar such a plea as such award is a
nullity.
Nsk India Sales Company Private Limited vs Proactive Universal Trading Company ... on 30 November, 2017
● “NSK India Sales Company Private Limited v. Proactive Universal
Trading Company Private Limited reported in 2015 SCC OnLine
Mad 10355” for the point that the arbitration cannot be based on
unsigned document and there cannot be an arbitration clause by
implication. Arbitration agreement has to be in writing and that is
mandatory.
Taipack Limited And Ors. vs Ram Kishore Nagar Mal on 23 May, 2007
● “Taipack Limited & Ors., v. Ram Kishore Nagar Mai reported in
2007 SCC OnLine Del 804” and “Parmeet Singh Chatwal and
Page No.6/18
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.No.2686 of 2023
Others v. Ashwani Sahani reported in 2020 SC OnLine Del 1881”
for the point that the signature in the copy of the invoice cannot
tantamount to acceptance of the respondent so called offer for
arbitration. The signature in such a situation were evidently an
acknowledgement of receipt of the goods and nothing more. The
conditions contained on the reverse of the invoice could not be
inferred to be consent for arbitration.