Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.27 seconds)
Adarsh Verma @ Aniket And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home And ... on 15 February, 2023 cites

S.W. Palanitkar And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 18 October, 2001

In S.W. Palankattkar & others Vs. State of Bihar, 2002 (44) ACC 168, it has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that quashing of the criminal proceedings is an exception than a rule. The inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C itself envisages three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised:-(i) to give effect an order under the Code, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of the court ; (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. The power of High Court is very wide but should be exercised very cautiously to do real and substantial justice for which the court alone exists.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 2481 - Full Document

Satendra Kumar Antil vs C.B.I. And Another on 1 July, 2021

Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case the present application moved on behalf of the applicants is finally disposed of in terms that the applicants may move an appropriate regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. before the trial court within 30 days from today and if such an application is moved within the period stipulated herein-before, the trial court shall be under an obligation to dispose of the same strictly, in accordance with the law as laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra) after hearing the Public Prosecutor.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 17536 - Full Document
1   2 Next