Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)
Smt.Gulab Taj @ Gulab Jan vs The Managing Director on 1 August, 2018 cites

Union Of India vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 22 October, 1997

7. Learned Advocate for the claimants relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and others reported in 1998 ACJ 342 submits that the two pillion riders though were travelling on the ill-fated motor cycle with the rider of the motor cycle, they did not have control over the motor cycle; since they are not at all at fault, the finding relating to the contributory negligence may not be applicable to the pillion riders, inasmuch as, they have not contributed anything to the accident in question. Said submission cannot be accepted. In the matter on hand, the rider of the two wheeler did not have driving licence. Nothing is produced by the claimants to 14 show that the rider of the two wheeler had got driving licence. Nothing is also placed by the claimants to show as to under what circumstances, the two pillion riders boarded the two wheeler.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 87 - M J Rao - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

19. Lastly, Shri Gopal Krishna, the counsel for the claimants justifiably submits that in M.F.A. No.2105/2016 arising from M.V.C. No.918/2013, the age of the deceased has been taken at 40 by the M.A.C.T. on the basis of Postmortem Report, the Election I.D. Card and other documents, and therefore the addition in terms of ratio of Pranay Sethi Case would be 30% to the notional income of the deceased, hence the notional monthly income comes to Rs.10,400/-. In M.F.A. No.2106/2016 arising from 24 M.V.C. No.917/2013, the age of the deceased is taken at 43 by the M.A.C.T., and therefore the addition would be 25% since the deceased was in the age group of 40-50, going by the Postmortem Report and the Election I.D. Card. Thus the notional monthly income comes to Rs.10,000/-.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document
1