Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)

Union Of India And Ors vs Mohd. Ramzan Khan on 20 November, 1990

10. ECIL (supra) by a larger Bench, on a reference made, reaffirmed the dictum in Mohd. Ramzan Khan (supra). These were cases in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court found that a reasonable opportunity, to defend the allegation of misconduct levelled and represent against the findings of the enquiry report, was not afforded to the delinquent employee; in which case alone there could be a remand made for the purpose of curing the defect and affording a reasonable opportunity to the delinquent employee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 668 - R B Misra - Full Document

Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993

10. ECIL (supra) by a larger Bench, on a reference made, reaffirmed the dictum in Mohd. Ramzan Khan (supra). These were cases in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court found that a reasonable opportunity, to defend the allegation of misconduct levelled and represent against the findings of the enquiry report, was not afforded to the delinquent employee; in which case alone there could be a remand made for the purpose of curing the defect and affording a reasonable opportunity to the delinquent employee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 64 - Cited by 2043 - Full Document

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Vikash Kumar Rajak & Ors on 7 March, 2017

18. As to whether the High Court in its exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution is entitled to interfere when the finding in a disciplinary proceeding is Patna High Court L.P.A No.495 of 2024 dt.07-01-2025 13/17 based on no evidence came up for consideration of this Court in LPA no.446 of 2024 (The State of Bihar and Ors vs. Vikash Kumar @ Vikas Kumar), paragraph nos.8 to 13 of which is reproduced herein below for ready reference:
Patna High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document
1