Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.32 seconds)Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
S.S. Rana vs Registrar, Co-Operative Societies & ... on 25 April, 2006
9. Similar reiteration of law can be found in S. S. Rana
vs. Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Another (2006)
11 SCC 634, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court was dealing
with the case of an employee of Kangra Central Cooperative
Bank Ltd., which was a Society and had not been constituted
under any statute. It is in this background, it was observed that
the functions of the bank like any other cooperative societies
were mainly regulated in terms of the provisions of the H.P.
Cooperative Societies Act, 1968 except as provided in the bye-
Satimbla Sharma & Ors vs St.Paul Sr.Secondary School & Ors on 11 August, 2011
12. Even though the school is affiliated to CBSE but
being unaided is, therefore, not a State within Article 12 of the
Constitution of India, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Satimbla Sharma vs. St. Pauls Senior Secondary School
(2011) 13 SCC 760. Nevertheless the school discharges a
public duty of imparting education, a fundamental right of the
citizens. The school affiliated to CBSE is therefore, an 'authority'
amenable to the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India.
Apollo Tyres Ltd vs C.P. Sebastian on 30 April, 2009
a public law element and not to enforce a contract of personal
service, which contract includes all matters relating to the
service of an employee confirmation, suspension, transfer,
termination etc. (Ref. Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. C. P. Sebastian
(2009) 14 SCC 360).
Sushmita Basu & Ors vs Ballygunge Siksha Samity & Ors on 22 September, 2006
In Sushmita Basu and Ors. vs. Ballygunge
Siksha Samity and Ors. (2006) 7 SCC 680, a teacher of
recognized private school had filed a writ petition to fix the
salary of the teaching and non-teaching staff of the school and to
remove all anomalies in the in the pay-scales as recommended
by the Third Pay Commission as extended to other government
aided school or government schools.
K.K. Saksena vs International Commission Of ... on 25 February, 2015
In K. K. Saksena vs. International Commission
on Irrigation and Drainage and Ors, (2015) 4 SCC 670, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court surveyed the entire case law on the point
and observed as under:-
Trigun Chand Thakur vs State Of Bihar on 9 July, 2019
26. Similar reiteration of law can be found in a very
recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal
No(s). 10003 of 2019, titled as Trigun Chand Thakur vs. State of
Bihar & Ors., decided on 09.07.2019 wherein a Division Bench of
the High Court of Patna had affirmed the judgment of learned
Single Judge holding that Management Committee of the private
schools is not "State" within the meaning of Article 12 of the
Constitution of India and hence the writ petition was not
maintainable.
Chandra Nath Thakur And Ors. vs The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board And ... on 29 January, 1999
29. It was further held that even a consent order cannot
confer jurisdiction over the Court and does not make the
Managing Committee "State" within the meaning of the Article
12 of the Constitution of India. The Hon'ble Supreme Court
dismissed the appeal after hearing the parties, perusing the
material on record and the judgment in Chandra's Nath Thakur
case (supra) by observing "we do not find any ground to take a
different view".