Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.31 seconds)
Principal Commissioner Of Gst& Central ... vs Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation on 24 April, 2024 cites

Cuddalore Municipality vs The Joint Commissioner Of Gst & on 22 March, 2021

8. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned order dated 30-9-2022 passed by the respondent is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. The respondent shall pass final orders, after giving due consideration to the orders of this Court in the cases of (a) Cuddalore Municipality v. Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise in W.P. No. 8900 of 2017, dated 22-3-2021 as well as (b) St. Thomas Mount Cum Pallavaram Cantonment Board v. The Additional Directors and others in W.P. Nos. 28468 and 28080 of 2021, dated 10-8-2022, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 2 - C Saravanan - Full Document

R.Nambi vs Tenkasi Municipality on 24 September, 2014

The Ld. Single Judge also referred to the case of R. Nambi vs. Tenkasi Municipality [(2015) (37) S.T.R 696 (Mad.)]. The petitioner therein was a licensee of the Tenkasi Municipality and challenged the demand of service tax served by the Municipality. In these cases the taxability in general was considered. The issue as to whether local authority (Panchayat, Municipality, Corporation) would be liable to discharge service tax as these services are provided in discharge of sovereign function was not considered.
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Home Solutions Retails (India ) Ltd. vs Union Of India Ministry Of Finance on 7 February, 2014

iv. Home Solution Retail (India) Ltd. Vs. UOI [2011 (24) S.T.R. 129 (Del.)], Home Solution II In these cases there was no specific discussion upon the issue whether local authority would be liable to pay service tax. In the case of Madurai Corporation, the Ld. Single Bench Judge sustained the demand mainly on the view that it was observed by the Hon'ble High Court in the batch case that the Municipality can pass on the burden of service tax to the tenant (recipient of service tax).
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 47 - Full Document
1   2 Next