Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.74 seconds)A. S. Parmar & Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 24 January, 1984
144. Therefore, the judgment rendered in the case of A.
S. Parmar Vs. State of Haryana (supra) is not at all
applicable in the case at hand, as under paragraph 8 of
Page | 88
2026:JHHC:11185-DB
the said judgment it has been mentioned that under
Rule 6 (b) of the Punjab & Haryana Class-I Engineer
Rules, the experience of eight years working as Assistant
Engineer (Class-II) has been statutorily recognized as
alternative qualification to that of the Degree by virtue of
legislative indent, which is absent in Rule-8 of the
Bihar/Jharkhand Class-I Rule of 1939, nor such
legislative indent can be introduced by Judicial Fiat. For
ready reference, relevant paragraph of the judgment is
quoted as under:
Md. Amin @ Sk. Md. Amin vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011
146. Thus, it is evident that since there is no such
provision in Rule-8 of Bihar Engineering Services Class I
Rules, 1939, which prescribes only qualification i.e.
Degree or diploma in Engineering from an Indian
Engineering College either by direct appointment or for
appointment by way of promotion, the judgment of A.S.
Pramar is totally non applicable in the present case and
therefore does not supersedes the Division Bench
Judgment of the Hon'ble Patna High Court in S.K. Md.
Amir Ansari Vs. State of Bihar (supra).
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 72 in Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Section 73 in Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Deep Chand vs The State Of Rajasthan on 30 March, 1961
32. This rule has since been approved by this Court
in Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of V.P. and
again in Deep Chand v. State of Rajasthan.
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Singhara Singh And Others on 16 August, 1963
These
cases were considered by a three- judge bench of this
Court in State of U.P. v. Singhara Singh and the
rule laid down in Nazir Ahmad case was again
upheld. This rule has since been applied to the
exercise of jurisdiction by courts and has also been
recognized as a statutory principle of administrative
law."
M/S Zuari Cement Ltd. vs Regional Director E.S.I.C. Hyderabad . on 3 February, 2016
120. Reference may also be made to the judgment
rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Zuari
Cement Ltd. v. Regional Director ESIC Hyderabad (in
Civil Appeal No. 5138-40/2007), reported in (2015) 7
SCC 690, wherein, it has been held at paragraph-14 as
under: