Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.26 seconds)
Gundarna Vibhagiya Khet Utpann ... vs Authorized Officer, General Election ... on 19 January, 2022
cites
Section 11 in The Gujarat Co-Operative Societies Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Gujarat Co-Operative Societies Act, 1961
Manda Jaganath vs K.S.Rathnam & Ors on 16 April, 2004
In the case of Manda Jaganath v. K S Rathnam, reported in
AIR 2004 SC 3600, the Apex Court has held after considering
the provisions of Article 329(B) of the Constitution of India
Page 12 of 19
Downloaded on : Fri Jan 21 20:43:23 IST 2022
C/SCA/19293/2021 ORDER DATED: 19/01/2022
that "there are special situations wherein writ jurisdiction can
be exercised but, special situation means error having the
effect of interfering in the free flow of the scheduled election
or hinder the progress of the election which is the paramount
consideration."
Election Commission Of India Through ... vs Ashok Kumar & Ors on 30 August, 2000
In the case of Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar,
reported in 2000(8) SCC page 216, the Apex Court held that
the order issued by the Election Commission is open to
judicial review on the ground of malafide or arbitrary
exercise of powers.
Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 25 September, 2001
32.1. The Supreme Court, in the case of Shri Sant Sadguru
Janardan Swamy (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha
Page 13 of 19
Downloaded on : Fri Jan 21 20:43:23 IST 2022
C/SCA/19293/2021 ORDER DATED: 19/01/2022
Utpadak Sanstha and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and
Ors (2001) 8 SCC 509, while dealing with the Maharashtra
Cooperative Societies Act, held that in the process of election
of the Managing Committee of a specified society where the
election process having been set in motion, the High Court
should not stay the continuation of the election process even
though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of
rules while preparing the electoral roll. It was held that the
proper remedy is by way of election petition before the
Election Tribunal.
Bhesavahi Group Vividh Karyakari Seva ... vs State Of Gujarat And Others on 28 June, 2016
In view of the ratio as laid down by this Court as well
as Hon'ble Supreme Court the writ-applicant cannot be said to
be remedy-less as submitted by Mr. Vakharia. The writ-
applicant can avail statutory remedy of filing a Election
Petition after the election is concluded under Rule 28 of the
Rules, 1965. Rule 28 of the Rules 1965 reads thus :-
Sabarkantha District Coop. Purchase & ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 27 June, 2019
31.1. In the case of Mehsana Dist. Coop. Sales and Purchase
Union v. State of Gujarat (1988 (2) GLR 1060), after
following the decision rendered by the Apex Court in the case
reported in the case of Gujarat University v. N U Rajguru,
(1988 (1) GLR 308), the Court have noted the observations
made by the Hon'ble Apex Court as under: