Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.52 seconds)

Krushna Chandra Sahu (Dr.) And Others vs State Of Orissa And Others on 8 September, 1995

"9. From the proposition of law laid down by this Court in the above mentioned case it is evident that previous procedure was not to have any minimum marks for viva voce. Therefore, prescribing minimum marks for viva voce was not permissible at all after written test was conducted. There is no manner of doubt that the authority making rules regulating the selection can prescribe by rules the minimum marks both for written examination and viva voce, but if minimum marks are not prescribed for viva voce before the commencement of selection process, the authority concerned, cannot either during the selection process or after the selection 33 process add an additional requirement/qualification that the candidate should also secure minimum marks in the interview. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that prescription of minimum marks by the respondent at viva voce, test was illegal."
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 142 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1   2 3 Next