Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.27 seconds)The Water (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1974
Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 February, 2017
9. It is submitted that, out of 196 towns in Rajasthan 107 STPs are
operational in 68 towns of the state and FSTPs have been
announced in 118 towns where adequate water supply is not
available. For remaining 10 towns, concerning urban local bodies
14
are taking action about waste water treatment. Status of
Compliance of STPs in Rajasthan State (O.A. No. 593/2017,
Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.) has
been attached on Annexure R-4.
Section 26 in The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 [Entire Act]
Suraj Pradip Ajmera vs Aurangabad Municipal Corporation on 9 March, 2022
"......Further, for maximizing use of treated sewage, PCB may identify
potential industrial clusters, major industrial sectors and other bulk
users to tie-up each STP with the User group. In this regard, provisions
of 'The Haryana Water Resources (Conservation, Regulation and
Management) Authority (Amendment) Act, 2022' may be strictly
followed. CPCB may also assist HSPCB in this regard. The Tribunal
vide order dated 09.03.2022 in OA No. 29/2020(WZ), Suraj Pradip
Ajmera vs. Aurangabad Municipal Corporation directed as follows:
Sukhwanti Dalal vs State Of Haryana And Others on 4 October, 2017
Industries Association may be associated in the project of sewage
treatment and can bear a part of the cost out of Corporate
16
Order dated 19.04.2022 in OA No. 887/2019 in Sukhwanti v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Delhi Jal Board vs National Campaign Etc.& Ors on 12 July, 2011
11. Another significant issue relates to accidents in the course of
cleaning and maintenance of sewerage systems.17 In terms of
directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Delhi Jal Board v. National
Campaign for Dignity & Rights of Sewerage & Allied Workers, (2011)
8 SCC 568, the State needs to put in place effective mechanism for
ensuring safety of the workers employed for maintaining and cleaning
the sewage system.
Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti & Anr vs Union Of India on 21 September, 2020
12. The Tribunal has considered the issue of utilization of treated
sewage to save potable water for drinking purposes inter-alia vide
order dated 21.09.2020 in O.A. No. 148/2016 Mahesh Chandra
Saxena vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors. By the said
order, the data of utilization of treated water as given in the CPCB
report dated 15.05.2020 and further report dated 16.09.2020 was
noted showing huge gap in reuse of treated water, which resulted in
potable water being used even for purposes for which treated water
17 3 die while cleaning sewer line in Panipat: