Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.57 seconds)Jai Mangal Oraon vs Smt. Mira Nayak And Ors on 5 May, 2000
16. Admittedly, the land in question was in favour of the
petitioners through the Patta of the year 1939 registered in the year
1940 and in view of that Section 46 of the Chhotanagpur Tenancy
Act is not attracted in light of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Jai Mangal Oraon and Others v. Smt.
Meera Nayak and Others (supra) as Section 46 of the
-13- W.P.(C) No. 129 of 2009
Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act came into force in the year 1947.
Situ Sahu And Others vs The State Of Jharkhand And Others on 10 September, 2004
15. The argument of the learned counsel for the respondent
no.3 with regard to fraudulent document is not being accepted by
the Court in view of the proposition laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Situ Sahu and Others v. State of
Jharkhand and Others (supra).
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 72 in Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 83 in Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
1