Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.27 seconds)

Mrs. Jamuna Uke vs State Of Chhattisgarh 121 ... on 3 November, 2017

15. It is not in dispute that cheque in question bearing Ex.CW1/ 3 was drawn on account maintained by the accused and the same have been signed by the accused. The reason for dishonour of cheques in question as mentioned in cheque return memos Ex.CW1/4 is "Alter req dwrs authentication". The legal demand notice i.e. Ex.CW1/5 was sent to the accused on his correct address. The Postal receipt bearing Ex.CW1/ 6 and the internet generated tracking report bearing Ex.CW1/7 stating 'item delivered' was filed as proof of sending of legal CC NI ACT 6572/2023 Digitally signed by MANOJ KUMAR KAPOOR Vs. AMAN PANDEY Page 8 of 11 komal komal Date:
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 2807 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next