Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.36 seconds)
P.G. Textile Mills (Pvt.) Limited, ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 19 November, 1974 cites

Vittaldas Jagannathadas And Anr. vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 11 September, 1964

Therefore, the legal position having been finally settled by their Lordships by approving the discordant note sounded by Anantanarayanan, J. in Vittaldas Jagannathdas (supra) the conclusion was inescapable, if the settled law was followed by the Central Government, that the petitioner-company was entitled to the full infancy benefit from the date when it set up its new establishment, i.e., on May 15, 1972. In that view of the matter we would have to quash the decision of the Central Government because the settled legal principles had not been followed and the decision rested on totally irrelevant misconceived grounds.
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs Ogale Glass Works on 1 September, 1971

We had also referred to the decision in Union of India v. Ogale Glass Works, [1971 - I L.L.J. 573], where it had been held that the employer could resort to this remedy in case of such doubt as to the implementation of the Act. Therefore, the scheme of S. 19A was that this function of deciding these statutory issues as to the relevant facts on which the question of the applicability of the Act turned was left to the decision of the Central Government and the decision of the Central Government operated as a final adjudication on these statutory questions and it was given finality under the Act. Therefore, it is in the light of this settled legal position that this decision under S. 19A is a quasi-judicial decision, which has to be arrived at by the Central Government as per the relevant guidelines, that we have to examine the present question.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 19 - C A Vaidyialingam - Full Document
1   2 3 Next