Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)Section 5 in The Drugs And Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
The Drugs And Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954
Section 7 in The Drugs And Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) Lal ... vs Union Of India And Others on 18 December, 1959
The question whether the advertisements forbidden by
the provisions of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable
Advertisements) Act, 1954 are protected by the Right to Freedom of
Speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution is no
longer res integra, the same having been authoritatively answered in
the negative by the decision of Supreme Court in the case of
Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) Lal Kuan, Delhi and Another vs. Union
of India and Others, AIR 1960 (SC) 554. Their Lordships while
repelling the contention that advertisements forbidden under the Act
aforementioned are protected by Article 19(1)(a) observed:-
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
K.S. Saini And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi), Through ... on 19 October, 1966
Such people can cause injury to
the society. The existence of astrological influences has not been
denied nor advertisement of astrology or astrologers banned in the
country. It also alleges that advertisements which talk about cure or
remedy falling out of the above Schedule cannot be regarded as
offensive or violative of the Act. Reliance in support of that is placed
upon the decision of this Court in K.S. Saini and Another vs. Union of
India reported as AIR 1967, Punjab, 322.
1