Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.23 seconds)Section 16 in The Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000
Section 15 in The Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Jayanti Roy vs Dass Estates Pvt. Ltd. on 30 April, 2002
To the same effect is the law declared in the decision reported as (2002) 5
SCC 175 Jayanti Roy Vs. Dass Estate Pvt. Ltd., where the Supreme Court,
setting aside the decision of the High Court dismissing a revision petition
filed against the order passed by the Trial Court disallowing an application
to amend the pleadings, observed that where the appellant sought to explain
the nature of her possession and occupation by way of the amendment, the
same ought to have been allowed.
Baldev Singh & Ors. Etc vs Manohar Singh & Anr. Etc on 3 August, 2006
50. The well settled principles mentioned above were elucidated by the
Supreme Court in the decision reported as (2006) 6 SCC 498 Baldev Singh
Vs. Manohar Singh in the following words:
Ma Shwe Mya vs Maung Mo Hnaung on 26 January, 1921
In this connection, reference can be made to a
decision of the Privy Council in Ma Shwe Mya v. Maung Mo
AIR 1922 PC 249 in which the Privy Council observed:
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu vs The Motor & General Traders on 18 March, 1975
Relying upon an earlier decision reported as
(1975) 1 SCC 770 Pasupuleti Venkateswaralu Vs Motor and General
Traders, the Court observed: