Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)State Of Bihar Etc. Etc vs P.P. Sharma, Ias And Anr on 2 April, 1991
426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.)
M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004
192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage.
Amrawati Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru Collector Sultanpur ... on 16 July, 2019
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I don't find any ground to quash the summoning order and bailable warrant as well as entire criminal proceedings of the aforementioned case, therefore, the prayer for quashing the same is hereby refused
However, it is provided that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, then the bail application of the applicants be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court in exercise of power conferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.)
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Deepak Kumar Rajbhar vs Smt. Shanti Devi Rajbhar on 20 September, 2019
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for setting aside impugned summoning order dated 15.11.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate -I, Ballia as well as entire criminal proceeding and bailable warrant dated 4.9.2019 in Complaint Case No. 12 of 2018, Om Nath Rajbhar Vs. Sripati Rajbhar and others, under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Narhi, District Ballia.
1