Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)
Pratik S/O Ashoksing Rawat vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 2 May, 2022 cites

Supriya Suresh Patil @ Sow Supriya ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 May, 2018

4. The petitioner submitted his claim to the Scrutiny Committee for verification of certificate and after receiving the application, the Scrutiny Committee asked the petitioner to remain present before the Committee. As there was no order passed for long period, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No.5619/2017 (Pratik Vs. State of Maharashtra and one) before this Court. Due to filing of petition, it is alleged that, the respondent no.2 made superficial enquiry into the matter and passed impugned order dated 31/03/2018 and rejected the caste claim of the petitioner. The petitioner placed on record genealogy and documents including the declaration by this Court in respect of his uncle Deepak.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Pradip Bhimrao Nichale And Another vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate ... on 28 August, 2018

10. Accordingly the uncle of the petitioner Deepak was issued with validity certificate. The judgments so referred above have concluded that the paternal side relatives' caste validity certificate, unless quashed and set aside, must be relied upon, as held in Mukesh (supra), wp 2886-2019.odt 12/14 Milind Shirsath (supra), Bharat Bhagwan Taude (supra) Mayuri Pandhare (supra) and Apoorva Nichale (supra). When caste validity certificates have been granted to close blood relatives on the paternal sides the claim of other close relations ought to be upheld. It is only in case where the earlier caste validity certificate of close blood relations are shown to have been obtained by fraud/fabrication, a detail scrutiny and verification of the claim is required to be undertaken. As discussed above this Court already held by calling original documents that the documents relied on cannot be said to be fabricated and the said order has become final and conclusive.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 237 - R K Deshpande - Full Document

Mukesh Pandurang Bastav And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 23 November, 2017

10. Accordingly the uncle of the petitioner Deepak was issued with validity certificate. The judgments so referred above have concluded that the paternal side relatives' caste validity certificate, unless quashed and set aside, must be relied upon, as held in Mukesh (supra), wp 2886-2019.odt 12/14 Milind Shirsath (supra), Bharat Bhagwan Taude (supra) Mayuri Pandhare (supra) and Apoorva Nichale (supra). When caste validity certificates have been granted to close blood relatives on the paternal sides the claim of other close relations ought to be upheld. It is only in case where the earlier caste validity certificate of close blood relations are shown to have been obtained by fraud/fabrication, a detail scrutiny and verification of the claim is required to be undertaken. As discussed above this Court already held by calling original documents that the documents relied on cannot be said to be fabricated and the said order has become final and conclusive.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 5 - M Pitale - Full Document

Gokul Bhagwat Tayade vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 4 March, 2021

10. Accordingly the uncle of the petitioner Deepak was issued with validity certificate. The judgments so referred above have concluded that the paternal side relatives' caste validity certificate, unless quashed and set aside, must be relied upon, as held in Mukesh (supra), wp 2886-2019.odt 12/14 Milind Shirsath (supra), Bharat Bhagwan Taude (supra) Mayuri Pandhare (supra) and Apoorva Nichale (supra). When caste validity certificates have been granted to close blood relatives on the paternal sides the claim of other close relations ought to be upheld. It is only in case where the earlier caste validity certificate of close blood relations are shown to have been obtained by fraud/fabrication, a detail scrutiny and verification of the claim is required to be undertaken. As discussed above this Court already held by calling original documents that the documents relied on cannot be said to be fabricated and the said order has become final and conclusive.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - S D Kulkarni - Full Document
1